Quantcast
Channel: Eurasia Review
Viewing all 73722 articles
Browse latest View live

Voters In Several States Set To Roll Back Marijuana Prohibition This Year – OpEd

$
0
0

By Adam Dick

Polling suggests approval of state ballot measures in upcoming elections this year that would cause the number of states with legal medical marijuana to grow by three and with legal recreational marijuana to grow by one. Absent earlier legislative action in other states, recreational marijuana legalization approval in Michigan would make it the tenth state with such legalization, and medical marijuana legalization in Oklahoma and Utah, as well as Missouri where petition signatures for ballot measures have not yet been counted and verified, would bring the total number of states with legal medical marijuana up to 33. Tom Angell discusses in a Thursday Forbes article the polling indicating substantial majority support in these states for the respective forms of legalization the ballot measures include.

The movement of states to roll back marijuana prohibition, via ballot measures as well as bills approved by state legislatures and signed into law by governors, is a very important development for advancing respect for liberty in America. First, it significantly limits the war on drugs in America. That war on drugs has been a basis for the expansion of government power at the expense of people’s liberty and safety. Restraining or ending the war on marijuana in a state does not eliminate the war on many other drugs or all the terrible consequences of the broader drug war. But, it does provide relief from a portion of the broader drug war’s harms.

Second, rolling back marijuana prohibition at the state level provides an example for how states can withdraw from participation in aspects of dug prohibition pursued by the United States government, while demonstrating the nonsense of the Chicken Little arguments against ending prohibition. When people see that marijuana legalization, both medical and recreational, makes things better, they are more likely to consider that similar good results would come from ending the entire drug war.

Third, states going their own ways regarding marijuana laws are exercising an important check on the power of the US government. The Constitution defines the US government as having limited and enumerated powers, and provides no power to the US government to pursue drug prohibition. Nonetheless, the US government has pursued prohibition. While states may be powerless, short of war against the US, to stop the US government’s drug war, they can withdraw from participating in all of the drug war or any part of it — such as the war on marijuana. Without the cooperation of state and local police and judiciaries, as well as other state and local government resources, the US government lacks much of its prior ability to pursue the drug war.

Fourth, while Congress, successive presidents, and the US court system seem to have little interest overall in reducing the reach of US government power, states have shown through restraining marijuana prohibition that they can provide a check on expansive US powers. Let’s hope that marijuana law changes in states will lead to state actions to withdraw cooperation with the US government in areas beyond the war on drugs as well, thus limiting the power of the US government and expanding respect for liberty.

This article was published by RonPaul Institute.


Putin’s Spiritual Advisor Set To Challenge Patriarch Kirill’s Policies If Not Position – OpEd

$
0
0

Bishop Tikhon (Shevkunov), long identified as Vladimir Putin’s spiritual advisor and noted for his numerous outspoken comments on a wide range of subjects (portal-credo.ru/site/?act=topic&id=902), has been appointed to head the metropolitanate of Pskv and Porkhovsky by the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church.

He will presumably be elevated to the rank of metropolitan, thus putting him in a position to play a far greater role in church affairs than hitherto — he has had the relatively minor role of head of the Patriarcahte’s council on culture, a position he supposedly will retain – and puts him in a position to run for the position of patriarch once Kirill passes from the scene.

That possibility has been the subject of almost all commentary on the bishop’s elevation (e.g., kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5AFA8C21760A2, svoboda.org/a/29226589.html, forum-msk.org/material/news/14638502.html, bbc.com/russian/news-44089827, ruskline.ru/news_rl/2018/05/14/v_etih_pomeweniyah_reshalas_sudba_russkoj_pravoslavnoj_cerkvi1/, diak-kuraev.livejournal.com/2026704.html and sobkorr.ru/news/5AFA8C21760A2.html).

And it is certainly not impossible or even improbable. If Tikhon eventually becomes patriarch, he could be expected to put his and thus Putin’s mark on the church. But such a further elevation is some time in the future. The more interesting question is what does Tikhon’s latest rise say about relations between the Kremlin and the Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill.

First and most obvious, it shows that Putin already has effective control of the church hierarchy. Kirill has often gone off the reservation as far as the Kremlin is concerned, on issues having to do with Ukraine and Abkhazia, for example. But Tikhon was elevated by the hierarchs, a signal to Kirill that he doesn’t control the church as much as he may think.

Second, it gives Putin yet another lever to ensure that the Patriarchate and the Patriarch do what the Kremlin wants, especially as issues surrounding autocephaly for Ukrainian Orthodoxy highlight the weakness of Moscow within the Orthodox world. Kirill now knows there is someone the Kremlin would be only too happy to see replace him.

And third, Tikhon’s elevation likely puts the Orthodox Church on track to support an even more traditional caesaro-papist traditionalism than even Kirill has been willing to champion. The stronger Tikhon becomes, the more the Orthodox church can be counted on to promote the Russian regime’s portion of archaic and obscurantist anti-Westernism.

Those three things, even more than the distant possibility that Tikhon will one day be patriarch, are the most important consequences of his elevation this week

Chinese Consortium Acquires 25 Percent Stake In Dhaka Stock Exchange

$
0
0

By Sharif Khiam

A Chinese consortium will own a quarter of Bangladesh’s main stock market, officials said Tuesday, a day after the signing of a strategic partnership that formally rejected a rival bid from India.

The consortium, composed of the Shanghai and the Shenzhen stock exchanges, agreed to acquire 25 percent of the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) during the signing of the agreement on Monday evening, officials said.

The Chinese offer underscored an expanding investment rivalry between China and India in Bangladesh during the past few years, according to analysts.

“Both countries have more influence in Bangladesh, and there’s an intense competition among them,” Bangladeshi economist Anu Muhammad told BenarNews. “There will be a political dimension in their economic competition.”

The signing took place months after a widely publicized rift between Bangladesh’s state regulatory agency and DSE officials over which bid to accept.

On Feb. 19, DSE officials announced that they had voted unanimously to accept the Chinese consortium’s offer to pay 22 taka (U.S. 26 cents) per share, which was sweetened with an additional offer of about $37 million in technical assistance.

“The price of the entire 25 percent stake is $53 million which was sold at $125 million with premium,” DSE Managing Director K.A.M. Majedur Rahman told Reuters on Tuesday.

As part of the offer to acquire 450 million shares, the Chinese consortium also requested just one seat on the DSE board, while India’s National Stock Exchange (NSE) had offered 15 taka (about 18 cents) per share and also asked for two board seats, bourse officials told BenarNews.

The signing of the agreement was repeatedly delayed, according to local media reports, after issues were raised by a national regulatory agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Bangladeshi newspapers had reported that the Mumbai-based NSE tried to exert pressure on Dhaka officials into accepting its bid.

DSE, a public limited company, is one of the twin financial hubs of Bangladesh, alongside the Chittagong Stock Exchange. In 2018, the combined market capitalization of listed companies on the Dhaka bourse stood at more than U.S. $51.42 billion.

On the other hand, Shanghai and Shenzhen are among the world’s top stock exchanges with about $3.5 trillion and $2.2 trillion market capitalization, respectively.

DSE’s courting of foreign investment forms part of its demutualization process, which was approved by Bangladeshi authorities in 2013, local reports said. When a stock exchange is demutualized, it becomes a for-profit entity.

The demutualization plan included selling one-fourth of DSE’s stakes to mostly foreign entities in order to receive technological upgrades that would modernize the exchange, according to reports.

Millions of investors went bankrupt in November 2010 when Dhaka’s market crashed, with the exchange losing 1,800 points between December 2010 and January 2011. A three-member panel found heavy manipulation in the stock market and blamed the market regulator for failing to control the crisis, reports said.

‘China is the new friend’

A.B. Mirza Azizul Islam, a local economist, said the economic competition in his country between Beijing and New Delhi was “good” for Bangladesh, which has maintained a steady growth rate of 6 percent annually for about a decade based on its strong garments industry.

“We have the opportunity to invest here by both of these influential countries,” he told BenarNews. “There is nothing to worry about an ongoing global or regional rivalry between China and India.”

However, the Chinese attempt to invest in the Dhaka stock market is in line with Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, a geopolitical strategy by Beijing to build a vast network of ports, railways and roads that would connect China to the region, Muhammad, the other economist said.

China’s massive infrastructure initiative involves a long-term strategy for economic expansion that would also lead to a quiet encirclement of India, China’s main rival in South Asia, according to political analysts.

“India is scared of it. They think that if China’s influence increases here, their economic-political dominance can become weak. That is why India’s reaction is so overt,” Muhammad told Benar.

After NSE’s failed bid for the Dhaka bourse, its CEO, Vikram Limaye, flew to Dhaka to lobby for the SEC to reject the Chinese consortium’s offer, according to local reports.

Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, during an interview with Indian journalists in February this year, sought to dampen what local newspapers had described as “diplomatic instability” created by the Sino-Indian competition.

The bilateral relationship between Dhaka and Beijing has been on the upswing after Chinese leader Xi Jinping visited Bangladesh in 2016, during which deals worth almost $15 billion were sealed.

“India has no reason to worry about China’s investment in Bangladesh,” Hasina said. “Indian friendship has passed the test of time and China is the new friend.”

Indonesia: Political Party Accused Of Harboring Radical Groups

$
0
0

By Konradus Epa

Indonesian students and activists have accused the Islamic-based Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) of harboring radical extremists.

On May 14, hundreds of critics marched to the party’s headquarters in South Jakarta to pressure its leaders to stop using religion as a front for politicking.

This came a day after suicide bombers attacked churches in Surabaya, East Java.

They also called on fellow students nationwide to monitor the activities of PKS politicians and supporters in their respective regions.

“We urge all Indonesian people to reject the party’s religious mask and radicalism that triggers the crime of terrorism,” Amin Malawat, the coordinator of the action, told ucanews.com.

Malawat also demanded that the party dismiss cadres who had misled people by claiming the government orchestrated terror attacks against the Mako Brimob detention center on May 9 in Depok, West Java, and the suicide attacks in Surabaya, East Java on May 13.

Five police and one terrorist died in the detention center violence and the Surabaya suicide bomb attacks killed 23 people, including 13 bombers. Three churches and other sites were damaged.

Malawat also asked police, intelligence officials, the government and military to monitor all offices of the PKS in relation to the promotion of terrorism.

Last year, police arrested a member of PKS who allegedly provided $20,000 for the cause of Islamic State. However, he was later released after party leaders convinced police that the money was meant to support the Palestinian cause.

“We will boycott the party and shut down its operations in the regions if it continues to support radical groups and use religion for politics,” Malawat said.

However, PKS chairman Mardani Ali Sera denied all allegations and said he accepted criticism as being part of the democratic process.

“We also condemn acts of terror and have offered condolences to victims in the church attacks in Surabaya,” he said.

Sanusi, 34, a Muslim who works in private company in Jakarta, said he disagrees with PKS for using religious sentiments to gain support from people in the Muslim-majority nation.

He said such an approach “destroys religion” and threatens social cohesion.

Lucius Karus, a political analyst, said efforts needed to be stepped up to oppose radicalizing of religion for “nasty” political purposes.

Political parties should be pillars of democracy and work to improve living standards, not use religious fundamentalism to create communal divisions, he said.

The forerunner of the PKS, the Justice Party, was established in 1998.

The PKS currently has 40 of 560 seats in the national parliament and in 2014 legislative elections obtained more than 8.5 million votes.

Boris Johnson Says US Embassy Move ‘Is Playing Wrong Card At Wrong Time’

$
0
0

British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said the U.S. Embassy move “is playing the wrong card at the wrong time” and called for “restraint” in the use of live bullets by Israeli forces on Palestinian demonstrators Tuesday.

“Obviously we are extremely saddened by the loss of life that has taken place,” Johnson said in a statement.

“We understand that some have been provoking that violence, but on the other hand, there has got to be restraint in the use of live rounds,” he said.

Johnson said “the UK position is that we don’t agree with the U.S. decision to move the embassy.”

“We continue to believe that is playing the wrong card at the wrong time.”

He reiterated the “absolute” British commitment “to a two-state solution.”

The U.K. government on Monday said the killings of more than 50 Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank were “shocking” and destructive to peace efforts.

“The loss of life and the large number of injured Palestinians is tragic, and it is extremely worrying that the number of those killed continues to rise,” said Minister for the Middle East Alistair Burt.

“We have been clear that the U.K. supports the Palestinians’ right to protest, but these protests must be peaceful,” Burt said.

He said the U.K. would not waver from its support for Israel’s right to defend its borders, “but the large volume of live fire is extremely concerning. We continue to implore Israel to show greater restraint.”

At least 60 Palestinians were martyred and hundreds more injured by Israeli forces along the Gaza border Monday amid protests marking the Nakba anniversary and the relocation of the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

Since the border rallies began on March 30, more than 100 Palestinian demonstrators have been killed by cross-border Israeli gunfire, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry.

The rallies are to culminate on Tuesday, the 70th anniversary of Israel’s establishment — an event Palestinians refer to as the “Nakba” or “the Catastrophe”.

Last week, the Israeli government said the ongoing border protests constituted a “state of war” in which international humanitarian law did not apply.

Original article

Russia: Repression, Discrimination Ahead Of World Cup, Says HRW

$
0
0

The FIFA World Cup starting on June 14, 2018, will take place during the worst human rights crisis in Russia since the Soviet era, Human Rights Watch said. FIFA should use its leverage with the Russian authorities to address labor rights abuses, restrictions on fundamental freedoms, and an ongoing crackdown on human rights defenders.

The 44-page guide published today, “Russia: FIFA World Cup 2018 – Human Rights Guide for Reporters,” summarizes Human Rights Watch’s concerns associated with Russia’s preparations for and hosting of the 2018 FIFA World Cup and outlines broader human rights concerns in the country. It also describes FIFA’s new human rights policies and how they can be more effectively engaged to address the serious violations in Russia.

“Global sporting events such as the World Cup draw massive international media attention,” said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “We hope this guide helps reporters look beyond the football pitch to broader issues of concern in Russia.”

The backdrop to the tournament, which takes place over a month in 11 Russian cities, is a harsh and deteriorating environment for human rights, Human Rights Watch said. The authorities routinely use restrictive legislation to stifle freedoms of assembly, association, and expression. Government officials crackdown on dissent by enforcing repressive laws and increasing online censorship.

On May 11, German public broadcaster ARD announced its veteran sports reporter Hajo Seppelt was refused a visa to attend the World Cup in Russia. Seppelt and ARD have reported extensively on the sports doping scandal in Russia. Access for journalists to report is a central requirement of hosting the World Cup, Human Rights Watch said, and FIFA should act swiftly to guarantee media freedom.

“It is simply not acceptable to reject a journalist for doing his or her job, and FIFA needs to swiftly address and remedy the visa rejection by ensuring Hajo Seppelt can attend and report freely and without obstruction,” Williamson said.

On the international stage, Russia is providing weapons, military support, and diplomatic cover to the Syrian government, despite evidence that Syrian forces have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.

In a June 2017 report, Human Rights Watch published its findings on labor abuses against workers on World Cup stadium construction sites, including wage delays, unsafe working conditions, and worker deaths. As of April 2018, the Building and Wood Workers’ International trade union recorded 21 worker fatalities on World Cup sites.

FIFA confirmed Grozny as the base camp where Egypt’s national team will train during the tournament. Grozny is the capital of the Chechen Republic, Russia’s most repressive region. Oyub Titiev, Chechnya director of leading Russian rights group Memorial, remains in custody there on bogus marijuana possession charges. The head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, has repeatedly threatened and smeared human rights defenders, publicly referring to them as traitors and snitches. Titiev is one of the few remaining human rights defenders in the region and faces a 10-year prison sentence if convicted on these trumped-up charges.

In a February 2018 letter to FIFA President Gianni Infantino, Human Rights Watch urged FIFA to intervene directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin to call for Titiev’s release. Infantino and Putin met in Sochi on May 3, but it is not clear whether Infantino raised Titiev’s case.

In 2017 FIFA adopted a Human Rights Policy, pledging to “go beyond its responsibility to respect human rights” by taking “measures to promote the protection of human rights and positively contribute to their enjoyment.” The policy also states that “where the freedoms of human rights defenders … are at risk, FIFA will take adequate measures for their protection, including by using its leverage with the relevant authorities.”

“FIFA’s commitment on human rights defenders is welcome and essential,” Williamson said. “FIFA should show its commitment to human rights by urging the Kremlin to ensure Titiev is released before the World Cup kicks off next month.”

FIFA also added language on human rights protections to its statutes, staffed a human rights manager position, and established a Human Rights Advisory Board.

There are other steps FIFA can take to address and mitigate the human rights concerns raised by Human Rights Watch. FIFA should ask Russia to repeal its “gay propaganda” law, which violates FIFA’s requirements on nondiscrimination. FIFA should also urge Russia to end restrictions on demonstrations in World Cup cities before, during, and after the tournament.

“FIFA still has time to show that that it is ready to use its leverage with the Russian government to fulfill its own human rights policies,” Williamson said. “It’s in its interest to ensure the beautiful game isn’t marred by an ugly atmosphere of discrimination and repression.”

World Anger Mounts Over Gaza Deaths

$
0
0

By Daoud Kuttab

Israel faces mounting regional and international pressure over the deaths of Palestinian protesters on the Gaza border, with South Africa, Turkey, Belgium and Ireland withdrawing their ambassadors from Tel Aviv and the UN Commission on Human Rights calling for an independent inquiry.

Almost 60 Palestinians were killed in clashes with Israeli troops during protests to mark the 70th anniversary of Nakba — the expulsion of Palestinians from their homes — and the opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem.

Saudi Arabia’s Cabinet on Tuesday reaffirmed the Kingdom’s rejection of the decision to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem, a day after its official opening.

“This step represents a significant bias against the historical, permanent rights of the Palestinian people in Jerusalem,” an official statement said.

Secretary-General of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Saeb Erekat said that the Palestinian leadership would file a legal case against Israel with the International Criminal Court over settlement activity on occupied Palestinian territory.

Former Jordanian Deputy Prime Minister Marwan Muasher, now senior vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told Arab News that the killing of Palestinian protesters, coupled with the move of the US Embassy to Jerusalem, shows why “Israel cannot be trusted” to bring about peace in the region.

“I believe Jordan’s preferred course of action is the adoption of a policy that would keep Palestinians on their soil and that would not cooperate with Israel in any way,” he said.

Nour Al-Emam, a lawyer and member of the Palestine National Council, said the US was now complicit in the killings of unarmed Palestinians by the Israeli occupiers.

Media coverage of the killings in Gaza has also been criticized. Writing on his personal Twitter account, media specialist Mureed Hammad said that the “world media has shown a different face to dealing with Palestinian blood.”

James Martin, a Jesuit priest and editor-at-large of the Jesuit magazine America, condemned The New York Times for saying that Palestinians had “died” rather than Palestinians were “killed.”

Some Arab voices are also objecting to the silence of many Arab leaders. Mohammad Ersan, the host of a Radio Al-Balad talk show in the Jordanian capital, ended his program on Tuesday by asking if the Israeli ambassadors in neighboring countries would be sent home. His comment followed a decision by Turkey to order Israel’s ambassador to leave.

Veteran Israeli peace activist Gershon Baskin told Arab News that the opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem “is harmful to chances of peace and goes against international accepted positions that the future of Jerusalem must be decided and resolved by Israel and Palestine together.”

Dark Cloud Of Brexit May Have A Silver Lining – OpEd

$
0
0

By Yossi Mekelberg*

If UK Prime Minister Theresa May had deluded herself that her toughest Brexit negotiations would take place in Brussels, she is quickly waking up to a reality in which political skirmishes in the Palace of Westminster over leaving the European Union are equally fierce, if not more so. Divisions on almost every aspect of Brexit are surfacing daily, preoccupying the Conservative Party and causing major rifts within it, whilst the government must also deal with its profound disagreements with opposition parties on the issue.

It is 10 months before the UK’s scheduled departure from the EU, and neither the process for an orderly Brexit nor any of the substantive issues leading to the exit door have been agreed. Britain is as divided today as it was two years ago, when it voted by a tiny majority to walk out of the European project.

Differing opinions on an issue of such magnitude for the future of the country are only natural, but the illusion that Great Britain can cherry-pick what it would like to retain from its membership and what it would like to discard is a genuine worry. This approach, not surprisingly, is facing robust resistance from the other 27 members of the EU, as it undermines the very ideological and practical justification for the existence of the bloc as it is. This in turn complicates not only the negotiations with Brussels, but also the British government’s calculus of what its objectives should be regarding its future relations with the rest of the continent, how these can be achieved, and what it believes can eventually be supported by Parliament.

It is also the case that there is still a majority in both houses of Parliament — the Commons and the Lords — that supports remaining in the EU and is convinced that it can mitigate, if not avert Brexit altogether. Facing them are the hard-core Brexiteers, who are deeply suspicious of the government’s and the Remainers’ intentions, and who assert that they are submitting to the will of the majority as expressed in the referendum. As a matter of fact, they are not far from the truth. While there is a vociferous group of Brexiteers in Parliament who are hell-bent on leaving the EU regardless of whether there is a good deal, a bad deal or no deal at all, there are many more who would like no more than a nominal exit while maintaining most of the core aspects of membership. A sensible approach would aim to identify and concentrate on key areas that are of vital interest to the UK in an effort to at least minimize the hardships caused by Brexit. Already, there are warnings of rising food prices, loss of research funds and jobs that will move elsewhere in Europe.

Moreover, any outcome of the negotiations should leave enough flexibility, given the right conditions, for the UK to seek closer relations with or even re-join the European Union. At present, the exact opposite is taking place, with destructive long-term consequences, driving a further wedge into British society and into the UK’s relations with the rest of Europe.

For fear of embarrassing defeats, the government is avoiding tabling anything connected with Brexit before the House of Commons. This is consequently slowing down the process and preventing a genuine debate within the sovereign body, which represents the British people. This avoidance has led the Labour Party to accuse the government of “effectively subverting democracy.” The government’s tiny majority in Parliament has resulted in too much power in the hands of a small group of MPs, especially from the prime minister’s party, who have the capacity to inflict defeat on the government on any issue, at any given time.

Last week was particularly uncomfortable for the government, as it suffered a series of such defeats in the House of Lords, ranging from a bill to retain the UK’s participation in a range of EU agencies to one that removed the March 29, 2019, deadline for Brexit, thus enabling the process to drag on almost indefinitely. Even more striking was an amendment to keep the UK in the European Economic Area, which for all intents and purposes equates to staying in the European single market — in other words, as soft an exit as is possible.

While amendments made in the House of Lords are not binding until approved by the House of Commons, the unelected upper house is attempting to set an agenda that is more Europe-friendly and to force the government and the elected chamber to address these issues with the seriousness and severity they deserve. With cross-benchers on both sides of the Lords’ despatch box ready to defy their leaders and put the good of the country ahead of party political calculations, we can expect to see more of these amendments debated and gain a majority vote.

One suggestion being whispered around Westminster as a result of these political divisions and the ensuing stalemate is of forming a centrist party comprised of those who have become disillusioned with the anti-European nationalists within the Conservative Party and the old-school left of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour. These whispers are becoming louder and more frequent, and the whisperers may shortly become more explicit as Euroskeptics take hold in both parties and the anti-Semitism scandal engulfs the Labour Party.

The success of French President Emmanuel Macron and his La Republique En Marche party has triggered a substantial number of politicians and political commentators not only to think about the possibility of a major political realignment, but also to believe that such a third party could do well at the ballot box. One of the unlikely outcomes of the Brexit debacle might be the emergence of a much-needed political force that is Europhile, has a more global outlook, and has a progressive social consciousness — a rare silver lining within the dark cloud of Brexit.

*Yossi Mekelberg is professor of international relations at Regent’s University London, where he is head of the International Relations and Social Sciences Program. Twitter: @YMekelberg


Monitoring Lava Lake Levels In Congo Volcano

$
0
0

Nyiragongo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is among the world’s most active volcanoes, with a persistent lava lake as one of its defining features. In a talk at the 2018 SSA Annual Meeting, Adrien Oth of the European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology discussed how he and his colleagues are using multiple methods to monitor lava lake levels at the volcano.

The researchers analyze seismic and infrasound signals generated by the volcano as well as data collected during satellite flyovers to measure Nyiragongo’s lake level fluctuations. During the eruption in 2002, which caused a major humanitarian crisis, the lava lake was drained and the depth of the remaining crater was estimated between 600 and 800 meters. About four months after the eruption, the crater started filling up again. Nowadays, the inner crater floor is about 400 meters below the rim and the lava lake remains at high level.

“The lava lake level is, among other things, related to the variations of the pressure inside the magmatic system underneath Nyiragongo volcano,” Oth and his colleagues explained.” In that sense, the lava lake represents a window into the magmatic system, and its level fluctuations provide information on the recharge and drainage of the magmatic system, such as batches of fresh magma and/or gas, or lateral magmatic intrusions into the surrounding crust.”

The different techniques used to observe the lava lake offer a more complete look at the volcano’s activity, the authors said. The seismic and infrasound data, collected continuously, help researchers gauge pressure changes in magmatic activity. “Until very recently, very few high-quality data were available for this region,” the researchers noted.” Over the past few years, our consortium assisted the Goma Volcano Observatory to deploy one of the densest modern real-time telemetered monitoring systems in Africa. Combined with modern processing techniques, these newly acquired datasets provide unprecedented opportunities to investigate the behavior of this unique magmatic system.”

In combination with seismic and infrasound data, the scientists are using high resolution synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) images captured by satellites passing over the volcano to directly measure the rise and fall of the lava lake level. These images measure the length of the shadow cast by the crater’s edge on the lava lake surface, which can be used to calculate the lava depth.

The lava lake observations are only one piece of the puzzle within the regional volcanic system, and “will certainly be of key importance for successful eruption forecasting in the future,” said Oth and colleagues. “At this stage, however, these observations need to be first put into the larger context of the magmatic system in order to allow their proper interpretation in terms of eruptive processes.”

First Wireless Flying Robotic Insect Takes Off

$
0
0

Insect-sized flying robots could help with time-consuming tasks like surveying crop growth on large farms or sniffing out gas leaks. These robots soar by fluttering tiny wings because they are too small to use propellers, like those seen on their larger drone cousins. Small size is advantageous: These robots are cheap to make and can easily slip into tight places that are inaccessible to big drones.

But current flying robo-insects are still tethered to the ground. The electronics they need to power and control their wings are too heavy for these miniature robots to carry.

Now, engineers at the University of Washington have for the first time cut the cord and added a brain, allowing their RoboFly to take its first independent flaps. This might be one small flap for a robot, but it’s one giant leap for robot-kind. The team will present its findings May 23 at the International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Brisbane, Australia.

RoboFly is slightly heavier than a toothpick and is powered by a laser beam. It uses a tiny onboard circuit that converts the laser energy into enough electricity to operate its wings.

“Before now, the concept of wireless insect-sized flying robots was science fiction. Would we ever be able to make them work without needing a wire?” said co-author Sawyer Fuller, an assistant professor in the UW Department of Mechanical Engineering. “Our new wireless RoboFly shows they’re much closer to real life.”

The engineering challenge is the flapping. Wing flapping is a power-hungry process, and both the power source and the controller that directs the wings are too big and bulky to ride aboard a tiny robot. So Fuller’s previous robo-insect, the RoboBee, had a leash — it received power and control through wires from the ground.

But a flying robot should be able to operate on its own. Fuller and team decided to use a narrow invisible laser beam to power their robot. They pointed the laser beam at a photovoltaic cell, which is attached above RoboFly and converts the laser light into electricity.

“It was the most efficient way to quickly transmit a lot of power to RoboFly without adding much weight,” said co-author Shyam Gollakota, an associate professor in the UW’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering.

Still, the laser alone does not provide enough voltage to move the wings. That’s why the team designed a circuit that boosted the seven volts coming out of the photovoltaic cell up to the 240 volts needed for flight.

To give RoboFly control over its own wings, the engineers provided a brain: They added a microcontroller to the same circuit.

“The microcontroller acts like a real fly’s brain telling wing muscles when to fire,” said co-author Vikram Iyer, a doctoral student in the UW Department of Electrical Engineering. “On RoboFly, it tells the wings things like ‘flap hard now’ or ‘don’t flap.'”

Specifically, the controller sends voltage in waves to mimic the fluttering of a real insect’s wings.

“It uses pulses to shape the wave,” said Johannes James, the lead author and a mechanical engineering doctoral student. “To make the wings flap forward swiftly, it sends a series of pulses in rapid succession and then slows the pulsing down as you get near the top of the wave. And then it does this in reverse to make the wings flap smoothly in the other direction.”

For now, RoboFly can only take off and land. Once its photovoltaic cell is out of the direct line of sight of the laser, the robot runs out of power and lands. But the team hopes to soon be able to steer the laser so that RoboFly can hover and fly around.

While RoboFly is currently powered by a laser beam, future versions could use tiny batteries or harvest energy from radio frequency signals, Gollakota said. That way, their power source can be modified for specific tasks.

Future RoboFlies can also look forward to more advanced brains and sensor systems that help the robots navigate and complete tasks on their own, Fuller said.

“I’d really like to make one that finds methane leaks,” he said. “You could buy a suitcase full of them, open it up, and they would fly around your building looking for plumes of gas coming out of leaky pipes. If these robots can make it easy to find leaks, they will be much more likely to be patched up, which will reduce greenhouse emissions. This is inspired by real flies, which are really good at flying around looking for smelly things. So we think this is a good application for our RoboFly.”

VTT Marilyn, A Finnish Robot Car, Has Taken Leap Towards Automatic 24/7 Driving

$
0
0

VTT’s robot car, Marilyn, sees better than humans in foggy, and even snowy, conditions, and can now navigate without stopping – including in bad weather. It can also see a human through fog and avoid accident automatically. This is enabled by the LiDAR mounted on the car’s roof, which can see wavelengths that are beyond the human senses. As the technology evolves, this represents a big step towards a safe automated vehicle that is not even stopped by foggy conditions.

Most likely, for the first time, robot cars from different manufacturers will demonstrate their driving scenarios in the same arena at the RobustSENSE event in Ulm, Germany, where Marilyn will head with six other robots on 16 May.

The latest additions to Marilyn include optical component wavelengths via the new 1550 nanometre LiDAR and additional intelligence for its software, which improves sensor capabilities. Furthermore, software modules have been built in for the filtering of point clouds and the assessment of scanner reliability. This is to ensure the vehicle’s ability to function, including in fog and powdery snow, under which conditions the LiDAR radar, which ‘sees’ in the visible and near infrared ranges of the spectrum, even enables the robot car to see people better.

“Although Marilyn’s vision is limited to roughly 30 metres in thick fog, the new LiDAR type allows the car to be driven slowly rather than having full stop,” says Project Manager Matti Kutila of VTT’s RobotCar Crew team.

The car also has traditional automotive radars and LiDAR, but their detection of non-metallic obstacles and resolution is limited, particularly when trying to recognise shapes.

“Marilyn can also combine radar and LiDAR technologies by optimising the best aspects of the different sensors. This makes the automatic vehicle safer than a car driven by a person – although there are still lot of obstacles in development path, a major leap has been taken in the right direction,” Kutila emphasises.

“We still have a long way to go on the journey towards 24/7 automated driving, but we are now a big leap closer to achieving our dream. If we think of this as a 42km marathon, we are now perhaps 10km closer to our goal,” he comments.

More and more driving scenarios involved

More and more scenarios (such as cities, main roads, snow, exit ramps), which robot cars can manage, have been added. Marilyn will present her own special capabilities at the RobustSENSE event, along with six other robot cars.

“Marilyn will drive through a bank of fog created in a tent, which is so thick that the passengers cannot see through it. After passing through the chamber, the car will automatically avoid an obstacle in front, in this case a dummy. Among Marilyn’s sensors, the 905 nanometre LiDARs cannot see through mist – the new 1550nm LiDAR is the only sensor based on which a decision to swerve can be made,” says Kutila, describing the driving scenarios of his protege.

This is probably the first time in Europe that six robot cars will drive through their different scenarios in the same campus area, in which also pedestrians are also moving around. Other cars will negotiate crossroads automatically, engage in route planning, and change between manual and automated mode, which makes this exceptionally fascinating day.

Marilyn, on the other hand, will profile the ‘see through’ type of scenario, by driving through fog which even the observer cannot see through.

The LiDAR and sensor fusion technology of VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, SICK, Oplatek and Modulight are co-created in Marilyn.

The project in overall is joint effort of Daimler AG * AVL * Bosch * Centro Ricerche Fiat * EICT GmbH * Fico Mirrors S.A. * Fraunhofer FOKUS * FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik * Modulight, Inc. * Oplatek Group Oy * SICK AG * University of Ulm * VTT.

“Members of the public will also be able to hop into a robot car at an event which could feature the world’s first robot car traffic jam, but hopefully not chain collisions,” Kutila adds.

Marilyn will next try out her skills in an automated parking exercise in the summer, based on commands from outside the car. Her husband, VTT Martti, will also be making the news in the north during the summer and in November, when he makes route selections based on friction data and LiDAR.

Understanding Andean Concepts Of Death And Renewal

$
0
0

Research in the Andes has yielded evidence for a complex association between settlement sites and mortuary monuments, tied to concepts of death, ancestor veneration and water.

In the case-study Carved Rocks and Subterranean Burials at Kipia, Ancash, AD 1000 – 1532 published in De Gruyter’s journal Open Archaeology, authors Kevin Lane, Emma Pomeroy and Milton Reynaldo Lújan Davila analyse the Prehispanic-Spanish Colonial multi-faceted site of Kipia, in the Ancash highlands in Peru.

The site contains two small settlements, a cosmological centre, and a funerary sector of subterranean tombs. The author’s study reveals the stunning relation between ceremonial sites and cemeteries which underpins complex Andean concepts of death and renewal.

The authors paid special attention to the cosmological core of the site, which is arranged around a series of carved rocks – huanca -, a central huaca ¬(deity/ancestor), and a communal subterranean tomb. It was discovered that the various features of the site can be related to the surrounding landscape, which is remarkable since archaeological examples establishing a direct link between site and landscape in the Andes are not common. Even more remarkable is the fact that the discovery is supplemented by bioarchaeological data (the analyzed subterranean tomb – pukullo – presented in the research).

In the Prehispanic Andes the landscape was innately animated, and Kipia is positioned at the center of its particular physical environment. In this sense, Kipia was not just a repository for the dead, but more widely a place of communion between the living and the departed, associated to the central huaca-huanca, and the other carved rock-faces.

The importance of Kipia lies in its role as a local huaca dedicated to the lightening deity in which overt manifestations of life and death cohabited. In turn, Kipia linked into a network of other larger potentially sacred sites, such as the lakes.

Excavated, comparative highland Late Intermediate Period (AD 1000-1450) tombs are limited, especially ones linked to important sacred sites. In synthesis, this study makes a valuable contribution to the very limited literature on the use of communal burial structures in the Andes that is based on excavation, detailed osteological analysis and is in direct connection with a particular sacred landscape.

Dr. Alexis Mantha, an expert on Andean Archeology from Université Montréal, outlines: “This article provides a very interesting and rare case study of a complex animated ritual landscape in the highlands of Ancash, Peru, during late Andean prehistory. The authors convincingly examine the intricate ritual relationships among the skeletal content of a subterranean tomb (pukullo) and other features of the surrounding landscape such as a stone monolith (huanca), peaks and highland lakes.”

Forest Loss In One Part Of US Can Harm Trees On Opposite Coast

$
0
0

Large swaths of U.S. forests are vulnerable to drought, forest fires and disease. Many local impacts of forest loss are well known: drier soils, stronger winds, increased erosion, loss of shade and habitat. But if a whole forest disappears, new research shows, this has ricocheting effects in the atmosphere that can affect vegetation on the other side of the country.

A University of Washington-led study published May 16 in Environmental Research Letters shows that forest die-offs in specific regions of the United States can influence plant growth in other parts of the country. The largest impacts seen were from losing forest cover in California, a region that is currently experiencing dramatic tree mortality.

“These smaller areas of forest can have continental-scale impacts, and we really need to be considering this when we’re thinking about ecological changes,” said first author Abigail Swann, a UW assistant professor of atmospheric sciences and of biology. Such far-off effects are accepted in the atmospheric sciences community, Swann said, but the idea is only beginning to be accepted by ecologists.

A 2016 study from the same UW group looked at what removing trees from larger areas, like western North America or the entire Amazon rainforest, would mean for worldwide plant growth. This study took the same approach on a regional scale.

The project divided the mainland U.S. into the 18 regions used in the National Ecological Observatory Network. Researchers then ran a climate model to look at what removing the existing forest cover from the 13 most-heavily-treed regions would mean for growing conditions across the country.

Of all the regions, the Pacific Southwest region, which covers most of California, has the smallest total area of tree cover. But removing those trees had the biggest influence on growing conditions nationally, by reducing vegetation in the Eastern U.S.

The precise mechanisms would require further study, Swann said, but in this case it seemed to make Eastern summers slightly warmer, which was harmful to plant growth.

“Forest loss is disrupting or changing the flow patterns in the atmosphere that is leading to a slightly different summertime climate in the eastern part of the country,” Swann said. “It’s very analogous to El Niño or ‘the blob,’ something that’s occurring that causes the atmosphere to move around, which causes these warmer or cooler conditions, or wetter and drier conditions, somewhere else.”

Compared to an El Niño cycle, Swann said, “the changes we made here were smaller and over land, but it’s very analogous.”

The results also showed other Western regions, such as the Northern Rockies and the Great Basin region, as having negative effects on plant growth in the eastern half of the country. These regions are currently losing tree cover: California forests have lost more than 130 million trees since 2010, largely due to the combined effects of drought, warm temperatures, insects and disease.

“In some case trees may be killed by drought, but in many cases they’re being weakened by the drought and then being finished off by the beetles or other stresses,” Swann said.

The study suggests that current forest loss in Western regions is big enough to trigger changes in plant growth, though it might not be possible to detect these small changes over large areas of the country.

“There’s some pretty extensive, widespread forest loss going on,” Swann said. “The changes we made in the model are bigger, but they’re starting to converge with things that we’re actually seeing.

“These results show that we need to start thinking about how altering vegetation in one place can affect plants elsewhere, especially in the context of climate change.”

Bulgaria’s EU Presidency Sees ‘Opportunity’ On Macedonian Name Dispute

$
0
0

By Sarantis Michalopoulos

(EurActiv) — Bulgaria’s EU Presidency sees “an opportunity” in the long-standing name dispute between Greece and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) at a crucial meeting due in Sofia later this week.

The European Council granted Macedonia official candidate status in 2005, but its bid to join NATO and EU has been blocked by the name dispute with its southern neighbour, which has a province of the same name.

In April, the Commission proposed starting official talks with Skopje, as well as fellow Balkan EU-hopeful Albania.

Speaking on the sidelines of an event about the Western Balkans in Sofia on Tuesday (15 May), organised by the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Commission, Bulgarian Foreign Minister Ekaterina Zaharieva expressed her optimism about the ongoing negotiations.

Zaharieva explained that there would be a meeting between the two prime ministers in Sofia later this week and hoped that “they will be able to advance the negotiations”.

FYROM’s Prime Minister Zoran Zaev will meet with his Greek counterpart Alexis Tsipras on 17 May in Sofia on the sidelines of the EU-Western Balkans’ Summit.

“I see an opportunity there. I really hope they will finish these complicated but positive negotiations, which will be good for the citizens of both states,” the Bulgarian official told EURACTIV.com

In Athens, the government is cautiously optimistic about the negotiations but insists on its red lines. Government spokesperson Dimitris Tzanakopoulos reiterated today his country’s “clear and unequivocal position” for a compound name that will apply in all multilateral and bilateral international relations and transactions.

“This is a condition for an agreement, which requires a constitutional revision,” he added.

Tzanakopoulos added that the development in the region, which the government is trying to boost, is the “key” for stabilisation in the Balkans and a solution to the problem.

Following a six-hour meeting with the foreign ministers of both countries in Athens, UN mediator Matthew Nimetz said on Saturday that the two sides are engaged in “hard, intensive and positive work” to prepare the meeting for the two leaders.

NATO has also emphasised the need for a solution to the name dispute as a prerequisite before FYROM joins the alliance.

“NATO’s position is clear. As soon as the name issue is resolved, then Skopje’s accession to NATO can begin. The name issue has remained unsolved for years, but now we have a new momentum. We hope that Athens and Skopje will reach a commonly accepted solution,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg recently said.

Erdogan Wants To Be Turkey’s Lone Strongman: What If He Gets What He Wants? – Analysis

$
0
0

By Conn Hallinan*

When Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called for a presidential and parliamentary election June 24 — jumping the gun by more than a year — the outcome seemed foreordained.

After all, the country is under a state of emergency. Erdogan has imprisoned more than 50,000 of his opponents, dismissed 140,000 from their jobs, jailed a presidential candidate, and launched an attack on Syria’s Kurds that is, unfortunately, popular with most Turks.

But Erdogan’s seemingly overwhelming strength isn’t as solid as it appears, and the moves the president is making to ensure a victory next month may come back to haunt him in the long run.

An Economy Headed for a Fall

There’s a great deal at stake in the June vote. Based on the outcome of a referendum last year, Turkey will move from a parliamentary system to one based on a powerful executive presidency. But the referendum vote was very close, and there’s widespread suspicion that Erdogan’s narrow victory was fraudulent.

This time around, Turkey’s president is taking no chances. The electoral law has been taken out of the hands of the independent electoral commission and turned over to civil servants, whose employment is dependent on the government. The state of emergency will make campaigning by anyone but Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its ally, the National Action Party (MHP), problematic.

But Erdogan called for early elections not because he’s strong, but because he’s nervous about the AKP’s traditional strong suit: the economy. While growth is solid, unemployment is 11 percent (rising to 21 percent for youth), debts are piling up, and inflation — 12 percent in 2017 — is eating away at standards of living.

The AKP’s 16-year run in power is based in no small part on raising income for most Turks. But wages fell 2 percent over the past year, and the lira plunged 7.5 percent in the last quarter, driving up the price of imported goods. Standard & Poor’s recently downgraded Turkish bonds to junk status.

Up until now, the government has managed to keep people happy by handing out low interest loans, pumping up the economy with subsidies, and giving bonuses to pensioners. But the debt keeps rising, and investment — particularly the foreign variety — is lagging. The Turkish economy appears headed for a fall, and Erdogan wants to secure the presidency before that happens.

The Kurdish Question

To avoid a runoff, Erdogan needs to win 50 percent of the vote, and most polls show him falling short, partly due to voter exhaustion with the endless state of emergency. But this also reflects fallout from the president’s war on the Kurds, domestic and foreign.

The AKP came to power in 2002 with a plan to end the long-running war with Turkey’s Kurdish minority. The government dampened its suppression of Kurdish language and culture, and called a truce in the military campaign against the Kurdish Workers Party.

But in 2015, the leftist, Kurdish-based People’s Democratic Party (HDP) broke through the 10 percent threshold to put deputies in parliament, denying the AKP a majority. Erdogan promptly declared war on the Kurds. Kurdish deputies were imprisoned, Kurdish mayors were dismissed, Kurdish language signs were removed, and the Turkish army demolished the centers of several majority-Kurdish cities.

Erdogan also forced a new election — widely seen as fraudulent — and re-claimed the AKP’s majority.

Ankara also turned a blind eye to tens of thousands of Islamic State and Al-Qaeda fighters who crossed the Turkish border to attack the government of Bashar al-Assad and Syria’s Kurdish population. The move backfired badly. The Kurds — backed by American air power — defeated the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda, and the Russians turned the tide in Assad’s favor.

Turkey’s subsequent invasion of Syria — operations Olive Branch and Euphrates Shield — is aimed at the Syrian Kurds and is supported by most Turks. But, no surprise, it’s alienated the Kurds, who make up between 18 and 20 percent of Turkey’s population.

The AKP has traditionally garnered a substantial number of Kurdish voters, in particular rural, conservative ones. But pollster Kadir Atalay says many Kurdish AKP supporters justifiably felt “deceived and abandoned” when Erdogan went after their communities following the 2015 election. Kurds have also been alienated by Erdogan’s alliance with the extreme right-wing nationalist MHP, which is violently anti-Kurdish.

According to Atalay, alienating the Kurds has cost the AKP about 4 percent of the voters. Considering that the AKP won 49.5 percent of the vote in the last national election, that figure is not insignificant.

The progressive HDP is trying hard to win over those Kurds. “The Kurds — even those who are not HDP supporters, will respond to the Afrin operation [i.e., the invasion of Syria], the removal of Kurdish language signs, and the imprisonment of [Kurdish] lawmakers,” HDP’s parliamentary whip Meral Danis Bestas told Al Monitor.

The HDP, whose imprisoned leader Selahatt Demirtas is running for president, calls for a “united stance” that poses “left-wing democracy” against “fascism.” The danger is that if the HDP fails to get at least 10 percent of the vote, its current seats will taken over by the AKP.

An Outside Chance of Failure

Erdogan has also alienated Turkey’s neighbors. He’s in a tense standoff with Greece over some tiny islands in the Aegean Sea. He’s at loggerheads with a number of European countries that have banned him from electioneering among their Turkish populations for the June 24 vote. And he’s railing against NATO for insulting Turkey. (He does have a point — a recent NATO exercise designated NATO member Turkey “the enemy.”)

However, Erdogan’s attacks on NATO and Europe are mostly posturing. He knows Turkish nationalists love to bash the European Union and NATO, and Erdogan needs those votes to go to him, not the newly formed Good Party — a split from the rightwing MHP — or the Islamist Felicity Party.

No one expects the opposition to pull off an upset, although the centrist and secular Republican People’s Party (CHP) has recently formed an alliance with the Good Party, Felicity, and the Democratic Party to ensure that all pass the 10 percent threshold for putting deputies in parliament.

That electoral alliance excludes the leftist HDP, although it is doubtful the Kurdish-based party would find common ground with parties that supported the jailing of its lawmakers. Of the party’s 59 deputies, nine are in jail and 11 have been stripped of their seats.

There’s an outside chance that Erdogan could win the presidency but lose his majority in parliament. If the opposition does win, it has pledged to dump the new presidential system and return power to parliament.

Loaded Dice

The election will be held essentially under martial law, and Erdogan has loaded all the dice, marked every card, and rigged every roulette wheel.

There’s virtually no independent media left in the country, and there are rumors that the AKP and the MHP have recruited and armed “supporters” to intimidate the opposition. A disturbing number of guns have gone missing since the failed 2016 coup.

However, as Max Hoffman of the Center for American Progress notes, the election might not be a “slam dunk.” A run-off would weaken Erdogan just when he is preparing to take on a number of major problems other than the economy:

  • Turkey’s war with the Kurds has now spread into Syria and Iraq.
  • In Syria, Assad is likely to survive and Turkey will find it difficult — and expensive — to permanently occupy eastern Syria. Erdogan will also to have to deal with the thousands of Islamic State and al-Qaeda fighters now in southern Turkey.
  • Tensions are growing with Egypt over the Red Sea and Ankara’s new alliance with Sudan, which is at odds with Cairo over Nile River water rights.
  • There’s the strong possibility of a U.S confrontation with Iran, a nominal ally and important trading partner for Turkey.
  • There’s also the possibility — albeit a remote one — that Turkey will get into a dustup with Greece.
  • And last, there’s the rising price of oil — now over $70 a barrel — and the stress that will put on the already indebted Turkish economy.

The Turkish president may get his win next month, but when trouble comes, he won’t be able to foist it off on anyone. He will own it.

*FPIF columnist Conn Hallinan can be read at dispatchesfromtheedgeblog.wordpress.com and middlempireseries.wordpress.com.


ASEAN And Soft Balancing: South China Sea As Zone Of Peace? – Analysis

$
0
0

The soft balancing toward China by regional states, in particular by ASEAN, has produced mixed results. Is it time to declare the South China Sea a zone of peace under UN auspices? Despite limitations, this may be the next logical step to combine different efforts at institutional soft balancing and great power restraint in the region.

By T.V. Paul*

ASEAN member states have been pursuing a strategy based largely on soft balancing and diplomatic engagement towards China for over three decades. The soft balancing makes use of institutional mechanisms such as the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the East Asia Summit (EAS), and the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus). These platforms as well as negotiations to craft a Code of Conduct all play a part in efforts to restrain Chinese expansionism in the South China Sea. Soft balancing refers to the restraint of a threatening power using institutions, limited ententes and economic sanctions to delegitimise its policies. Hard balancing is based on military power and formal alliances to deal with such a state.

In recent years, however, fears have been expressed about the inability of such soft balancing efforts to produce concrete results, especially at a time when ASEAN members are increasingly divided, with some even possibly pursuing soft bandwagoning (i.e. not actively opposing expansionism while reaping economic benefits) vis-a-vis China. Critics rarely come up with alternative proposals, other than that the United States and its allies step up their military presence and challenge China, which may produce an outcome unpleasant to all parties, especially ASEAN members.

Time for Zone of Peace?

The question then is what the future of soft balancing is when pursued by using institutional mechanisms and limited ententes or informal alliances in restraining China and, to some extent, the US from generating aggressive policies in the region. Is it time to make a bold move to declare the South China Sea a zone of peace under United Nations auspices and encouraging China and the US to respect peace and tranquility in this theatre, with binding confidence-building measures and arms control commitments?

A zone of peace may be unpalatable to the great powers, but it may be in the interests of all, especially if the danger of war lurks behind attempts to carve out geographical spaces, weaponise the Ocean and limit navigation rights of states.

The challenges ASEAN faces in its soft balancing efforts are many.

First, the structural constraints: The international system is currently going through a re-configuration. The end of the Cold War produced a brief period of near-unipolarity in which the US emerged as an uncontested military and economic leader. But the 2008-09 financial crisis undermined that dominance. As the US-led order continues to fray, China’s economic power and influence have grown.

In terms of military might, China still lags the US. Instead, Beijing is adroitly using asymmetric strategies including island building and base acquisitions and more importantly, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and these are difficult to match. ASEAN members that were reasonably comfortable with the US-led order are suddenly forced to think of a world where China is emerging as a genuine contender to the American-led order, especially in the Indo-Pacific.

Institutional Constraints

The second challenge is institutional. The golden years of international institutions are the first 20-30 years of their founding. Usually, institutions emerge out of war or some major crises to enter either an international or regional order. The original sense of unity of purpose will begin to dissipate as the institutions come of age. The threat environment begins to change and fatigue tends to develop among member-states.

Institutions that are well-designed to deal with changes tend to do better, but most often they do not have built-in mechanisms for learning and adaptation. In this regard ASEAN has been fairly successful, but today it faces a multitude of challenges making the old rules based on consensus insufficient to deal with them.

The third set of constraints come from the changing strategies of China. Unlike previous rising powers, Germany and Japan in particular, China has resorted to an indirect strategy. Although called ‘peaceful rise’ and later ‘peaceful development,’ the strategies of building small islets in the South China Sea and limited naval expansion into the Indian Ocean have not been felt as threatening to state security as direct massive expansion by previous rising powers.

The slow expansion helps China avoid the hazards of a sudden power surge. At the same time, its emergence as the leading economic partner of ASEAN member-states and others such as India and Japan have limited their manoeuvering room.

BRI: China’s Version of East India Company?

The BRI is an indirect strategy for expansion. This interlocking of smaller states into a trading and investment system offers China hegemony without obtaining military dominance. This is China’s version of the East India Company of the colonial era, adapted to the times.

The lack of alternative sources of investment, especially for infrastructure projects, has made many Asian and African states turn to China. All ASEAN states are members of the BRI, even though some are benefiting more than others. This means that they have little interest to rock the boat. A failure of the BRI may turn states against China, but this is far from certain at this point. Active hard balancing, relying on formal alliances and military buildups, seems improbable as the economic conditions remain in favour of China in the foreseeable future.

So, what is left by way of strategy? Despite its limitations, soft balancing through existing ASEAN institutions and limited alignments seems a better option than doing nothing or resorting to hard balancing. However, adding a new approach, that is, declaring the South China Sea as a zone of peace, under UN auspices, and encouraging the great powers to sign protocols respecting such a zone may have long-term value.

This will be a broadening of the aspirational declaration signed in November 1971 by ASEAN foreign ministers which called on all powers to respect Southeast Asia as a Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality (ZOPAN). In this case, the main focus will be the South China Sea where great power competition has become intense in recent years.

A code of conduct for the South China Sea is important but it could be part of a larger zone of peace idea so that other parameters can be developed to restrain great power competition. These may include agreements on preventing accidents, heavy militarisation, and freedom of navigation, which can all form part of a UN-sanctioned zone of peace. Such a zone of peace is of vital importance to all trading nations, including China, as the success of BRI will rest on peace and order in the region.

*T.V. Paul is James McGill Professor of International Relations, McGill University, Canada, and currently a visiting professor at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. A former president of the International Studies Association, he is the author of the forthcoming book, Restraining Great Powers: Soft Balancing from Empires to the Global Era (Yale University Press, September 2018). An earlier version of this RSIS Commentary appeared in The Straits Times.

Croatia: Hate Speech Rising, Report Warns

$
0
0

By Anja Vladisavljevic

Hate speech and racist rhetoric has been increasing in Croatia, mainly targeting Serbs, LGBT people and Roma, warned the Council of Europe’s European Commission against Racism and Intolerance.

A report published on Tuesday by the Council of Europe’s European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, ECRI, said that hate speech has been increasing in Coatia and criticised the authorities for their inadequate response.

“The report – which analyses legislative issues, racist and homo-transphobic hate speech, violence and integration policies – notes a rise of nationalism, particularly from youth, which often takes the form of praising the fascist [WWII-era] Ustasa regime,” the ECRI said in a statement.

It said that most of the hate speech targets Serbs, LGBT people and Roma, and criticises what it describes as “an inadequate response by Croatian authorities to such increasing intolerance”.

Hate speech is too often not prosecuted as a criminal offence, the ECRI said.

“Most cases of hate speech and hate motivated violence are treated merely as misdemeanours,” it said.

However the report praised improved legal protection against hate crime through amendments to Croatia’s criminal code – which includes a new provision criminalising violent conduct in public places – but said that anti-hate crime legislation is rarely applied.

The ECRI also praised the enactment of the Law on Registered Same-Sex Partnerships, but said that prejudice and discrimination against LGBT people remains widespread.

However it criticised the authorities for only partially implementing national strategies to imprve the social inclusion of the country’s Roma population.

“The Roma continue to face high levels of social exclusion, and data suggests that their access to employment is alarmingly low and school drop-out rates still high,” it said.

It advised Croatia to introduce compulsory human rights education into the school curriculum, “especially regarding equal rights and prohibiting discrimination”.

It also advised that the National Roma Inclusion Strategy should be systematically revised to improve its effectiveness.

The ECRI report mainly covers the period up to the first week of December 2017.

China: Naval Drill And Regime Legitimacy – Analysis

$
0
0

By Palden Sonam*

President Xi Jinping reviewed the largest naval exercise in China’s history in the disputed South China Sea (SCS) on 12 April, barely two days after the USS Theodore Roosevelt  sailed through the same troubled sea as in what the US called normal routine training. The timing and venue of the military drill appears to challenge US’ regional presence, but this is a premature reading. The US enjoys naval supremacy over 95 per cent of the world’s oceans while China is still in the process of developing a strong navy. China’s naval display is thus aimed more at its domestic audience, other claimants of the disputed sea, and to some extent, Taiwan, rather than the US. For the single-party state, such a visible demonstration of power is largely to burnish the regime’s image at home, as an assertive posture can easily play into a powerful nationalist narrative around the rise of a strong China.

In his address to a gathering of 100,000 naval officers, Xi said that the need for China to build a strong navy “has never been more urgent than today,” and that it is required for China’s national rejuvenation. According to recent Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, while Chinese people became prosperous under Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, under Xi, China has become a strong country. Making China powerful as a state is an important element of Xi’s ‘China Dream’, and a massive show of military might thus may have to do with the development of his own cult of personality. What can also be gathered from this drill and Xi’s speech to the military is that there is a clear paradigm shift in the conduct of Chinese foreign policy, from Deng’s low profile and cautious approach to a more assertive and demonstrative one.

First, in his speech as the indefinite president of China at the conclusion of the 2018 National People’s Congress, Xi said that any attempt to undermine China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity will receive the “punishment of history.” After the Roosevelt sailed through the SCS, Xi had to take measures to match his words with action, especially with the passage of a US carrier through waters to which Beijing lays such strong claims. The ensuing Chinese actions would thus convey to the country its intent to safeguard territoriality and sovereignty, while bolstering the nationalist narrative.

Second, as the chief of the armed forces and as an exhibition of the long strides made by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) under his leadership, the drill was important for Xi at a personal level. By overseeing the largest Chinese naval drill till date, Xi projected himself as a hero figure in the development and modernisation of what he called a “first class navy.” This message also further underlines the nationalist sentiments the CCP wishes to strengthen, as well as Xi’s desire to project his own power within the party and the PLA, given that this was the first military exercise after the abolition of his term limit.

Third, this show of naval force serves as a warning to China’s smaller neighbours in Southeast Asia who disagree with its claims to the SCS and protest against its activities in the sea, such as construction of artificial islands and the area’s militarisation. It displays China’s determination and preparedness to guard its interests.

Fourth, China looks determined to unify Taiwan, and often warns Taiwan about the dangers of going a “separate way.” China’s naval exercise could thus also be a reminder to Taiwan to respect Beijing’s red lines and the futility of resisting eventual national reunification. Taking over Taiwan is a significant part of Xi’s mission for national rejuvenation. In fact, a week after the drill, China again launched a live-fire exercise in the Taiwan Strait, and Chinese media hailed it as a warning to those who advocate Taiwan’s independence. The US had recently passed the Taiwan Travel Act, which is seen by China as yet another attempt to damage cross-Strait relations.

Conclusion

Legitimacy has always been an important issue for the CCP, with implications for regime survival in the long-term. With economic growth slowing down in the midst of rising income disparity, ecological degradation and unemployment rates, the party state is likely to tap more into nationalism as the bedrock of its pursuit of legitimacy. In the event of widespread public discontentment within and outside the party, China may engage in some foreign adventures to divert public attention to an external enemy. Chinese nationalism today emphasises the idea of a strong China that can stand upto any big power, rather than a weak China that still bemoans a “century of humiliation” at the hands of Western and Japanese imperialism. Today’s proud China is also increasingly an assertive China as well.

*Palden Sonam
Researcher, China Research Programme (CRP)

The Kim –Trump Summit In Singapore: North Korea’s End Goals – Analysis

$
0
0

North Korea’s strong willingness to engage in active diplomacy has raised hopes for a ‘new era of peace’ on the Korean Peninsula. While many are wondering about Pyongyang’s intentions, two goals are driving the regime: legitimacy and reunification.

By Bhubhindar Singh*

Though only five months into the year, 2018 will be remembered for North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s participation in several bilateral summits following years of isolation since assuming power in 2011, climaxing in his Singapore meeting with United States President Donald Trump next month.

On 25 March, Kim made a surprise visit to Beijing to meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping that served as an important ‘reset’ in the Beijing-Pyongyang alliance. This was followed by a successful inter-Korean summit on 27 April that led to a significant thawing of inter-Korean relations, even raising the possibility of a peace treaty replacing the armistice that brought an end to the Korean War in 1953. On 12 June, Kim’s meeting with President Trump in Singapore could be decisive in committing North Korea (DPRK) to denuclearisation.

Unique Confluence of Factors

Despite the positive reactions from all sides, many questions remain. One such is what are the North Korean regime’s intentions or end goals. It is posited here that Pyongyang’s objectives are legitimacy and reunification. What explains Kim’s decision to come out of isolation is the alignment of four main factors:

First, President Moon-Jae-in. Like the previous two left-leaning presidents during the post-Cold War period (Kim Dae-jung and Roh Myu-hun), Moon supports engagement with North Korea. It was important for Moon to move away from the assertive policy pursued by the previous two conservative governments (Lee Myung-bak and Park Gun-hye) that had even called for regime change in Pyongyang.

Moon strongly believes engaging the North is critical in achieving stability on the Korean Peninsula. This approach manifested itself during the warm welcome extended to the North Korean leader’s sister, Kim Yo Jong, during the Pyeongchang Olympics, and again to the North Korean leader himself during the inter-Korean summit.

Second, the accession of a non-mainstream Donald Trump as president of the United States was another important factor. His unpredictability and strong interest in achieving deals facilitated a meeting with the ‘rogue’ North Korean regime – something that was unthinkable for previous American administrations.

Growing Pressure of Sanctions

Third, North Korea’s achievement of its nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities was also critical in pushing the Kim regime to agree to the summits. This point was made clear in Kim Jong-un’s New Year announcement that North Korea has reached the deterrence capability that secures the country from any threat, particularly the US.

The final factor relates to the impact of the extensive multilateral sanctions imposed on North Korea. Despite its long-standing approach of refusing to yield, the North Korean leader admitted that the impact of the sanctions on North Korea was the toughest in 2017. This was due to two expansions in the sanctions policy.

The first was the number of countries that participated in the sanctions against North Korea. The decision by China (North Korea’s closest economic partner) and certain ASEAN countries to join the sanctions regime amplified the negative impact of the sanctions for North Korea.

The second was the widening areas on which sanctions were imposed. The sanctions expanded from activities related to the nuclear and ballistic missiles programmes to economic activities in general.

Kim’s Legitimacy

In analysing the positive gestures and developments on the Korean Peninsula, it is posited here that North Korea’s intentions are to gain legitimacy for the Kim regime internally and from the international community. As Kim is a young leader who conceivably has a long tenure ahead as the leader of North Korea, legitimacy is a critical goal.

Kim’s decision to pursue an active diplomatic strategy could mean that he feels secure of his position internally both in political and military terms. His ability to participate in a range of bilateral summits that includes meetings with China and the US is a significant achievement that his predecessors have failed in before. Moreover, these meetings also show the leader’s ability to engage in tough negotiations to defend North Korea’s interests.

Kim’s performance in the summits with Chinese president Xi Jinping (China-DPRK) and South Korean president Moon (the inter-Korean summits), and willingness to meet the US President, displayed his statesmanship qualities and North Korea’s willingness to negotiate to bring about peace in the Korean Peninsula. This approach has somewhat softened the negative perceptions held by the international community of the isolated country and the Pyongyang regime.

Korean Reunification

The second goal of the Kim regime is to achieve the reunification of the Korean Peninsula without the intervention of external parties. This was clearly stated in the Panmunjeom Declaration signed after the inter-Korean summit in April 2018. Both states committed to ‘determining the destiny of the Korean nation on their own accord’.

Unlike South Korea, North Korea seems to strongly believe that Korean reunification should occur sooner rather than later. The legitimacy acquired from the bilateral summits contributes to North Korea’s gaining an upper-hand in the reunification issue.

Kim’s ‘charm offensive’ is directed at weakening the alliance between the US and South Korea (ROK) and their coordinated approach towards addressing the North Korean problem. If this is the case, the North would have a stronger negotiating position compared to its Southern neighbour simply owing to its ballistic missile and nuclear capabilities.

North Korea’s position would become even stronger when Kim’s strategy to pursue an economic reform programme to complement its relatively strong military comes to fruition. Through the bilateral summits with China, South Korea and the US, as well as with Japan in the near future, Kim’s strategy could be to incrementally have the economic sanctions lifted, receive economic aid, and pursue bilateral economic initiatives so as to kick-start the moribund economic growth of North Korea.

Agenda for Trump-Kim Summit

If North Korea’s diplomatic charm offensive is successful in its objectives, it could pave the way for the realisation of the North Korea-China vision of a unified Korea. In this vision, the role of the US would be relatively weaker than it is now, and China’s influence would grow through the strengthening of China-ROK and China-DPRK relations.

As denuclearisation is the most pressing issue for now, it will dominate the US-DRPK discussions in Singapore. However, it would be important for the American president to discuss this issue within the larger long-term context of the Korean Peninsula. In the summit talks, Trump is expected to maintain American advantage in the reunification of the Korean Peninsula as well as vis-à-vis China’s relations with the Korean Peninsula.

*Bhubhindar Singh is Associate Professor and Coordinator, Regional Security Architecture Programme (RSAP), at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

Islamic State Partnerships In West Asia: First Ba’athists, Then Kurds – Analysis

$
0
0

By Pieter-Jan Dockx*

With its attack on Shia militias, the Islamic State (IS) has recently regained prominence in northern Iraq. However, the brief period between the declared victory over IS and its current re-emergence -roughly December 2017-February 2018 – saw the manifestation of a new insurgent group called the ‘White Banners’. Named after its white banner with a lion’s head in the centre, the group was mainly responsible for attacks in the Kirkuk area. While no apparent official statements were made by the group, there is ample evidence suggesting that the faction was an alliance between IS and Kurdish organisations, possibly the Kurdish Free Life Party (PJAK). Although PJAK fighters had covertly joined the Kurdish Peshmerga in the battle against IS, the Iraqi government’s takeover of territories contested by both Kurds and Arabs like Kirkuk in October 2017 facilitated a strategic alignment between the groups. This commentary investigates recent and past IS partnerships that have gone unreported in mainstream media. It concludes that IS only cooperates with other insurgent factions when it finds itself in a position of weakness. When in a position of strength, the group aims to monopolise the insurgency.

Cooperation first occurred after the US withdrawal from Iraq in 2011. At that time, IS’ predecessor, the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), started collaborating with the nationalist Ba’athist insurgents of the ‘Jaish Rijaal al-Tariqa al-Naqshabandiyya (JRTN)’. In late 2013, around the time of Sunni protests against their marginalisation by the government, IS – at this time known as ‘the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS)’ – expanded its collaboration with the JRTN.

In both instances, IS found itself in a position of relative weakness in Iraq and thus decided to form a partnership with the JRTN. In 2011, ISI faced extensive pressure from security forces and local tribal fighters. It also lacked the manpower to pose a real challenge to these state-backed fighters. The group’s ‘breaking the walls’ campaign, in which prisons were targeted to free its fighters and boost its ranks, only started later, in July 2012.

Further, although the 2013 anti-government protests formed the perfect opportunity for ISIS to instigate sectarian strife in Iraq, the group had largely allocated its resources in Syria where it intended to take advantage of the civil war. Therefore, the Salafists decided to team up with the JRTN, whose political front was leading several protests but lacked the required tactical expertise to challenge the government beyond peaceful protests. In January 2014, their combined efforts seized control of Fallujah for several days after which it was retaken by the security forces. Thus, even with pooled resources, ISIS’ partnership still proved weak vis-à-vis the Iraqi security forces.

On the contrary, when ISIS was able to attain a position of strength and become the dominant insurgent group in Iraq, it ended its partnerships and turned against its former allies. While the January battle for Fallujah was still very much a combined effort, the June 2014 takeover of Mosul was essentially spearheaded by ISIS. Having established full control over Raqqa, ISIS was able to allocate more resources to Iraq. Although the group still allowed the JRTN to exist in the fringes of the insurgency, it soon turned against its partners, which were subsequently removed from the newly-established ‘Caliphate’.

A similar conclusion can be drawn from the recent alliance between IS and the Kurdish group. Cooperation between both actors manifested itself after IS lost most of its territory in Iraq to the government. The ‘White Banner’ phenomenon even indicates that IS found itself in a more precarious position than at the time of its partnership with the JRTN. While in past alliances IS still operated under its own name and flag, during its recent cooperation with Kurdish fighters, it accepted the use of an alternative representation. As it is only in the Kurds’ interest to use different symbols, it can be assumed that the demand was made by the Kurdish factions and a weakened IS agreed.

The recent resurgence of IS activity in northern Iraq did not feature White Banner attacks, confirming the hypothesis that a strengthened IS is unlikely to cooperate with others. Two possible scenarios can be further hypothesised. One scenario suggests that IS was able to demand the usage of its own name and credentials in the attacks, meaning they now find themselves in a relatively stronger bargaining position vis-à-vis the Kurdish resistance group. Another scenario could be that in this moment of strength, the Salafists ended all cooperation with the Kurds and the White Banners were dissolved.

In both instances, the ideological difference between the groups is further evidence of the necessity of their cooperation. While IS is a Salafist organisation that even labelled al Qaeda as “the Jews of jihad,” the JRTN finds itself at the other end of the spectrum as a nationalist, Ba’athist, non-sectarian, pan-Arabist organisation. Similarly, PJAK is a leftist-nationalist organisation that does not espouse IS’ ideology. Thus, while cooperation with another Salafist group could possibly be explained by ideological motives, the ideological distance between IS, the JRTN, and the Kurdish faction supports the idea that the partnerships were borne out of material considerations.

To sum up, the recent partnership between IS and Kurdish nationalistsis not the first time the Salafist organisation has cooperated with other (non-Islamist) groups. These instances indicate that IS only participates in alliances when it finds itself in a position of weakness. Given a chance, IS will end its cooperation.

*Pieter-Jan Dockx
Research Intern, Centre for Internal and Regional Security (IReS)

Viewing all 73722 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images